The authors hypothesised that in the event of an exacerbation, an

The authors hypothesised that in the event of an exacerbation, an action plan that aims at early contact with healthcare providers would promote prompt intervention, leading to faster recovery in symptoms and health status. The study shows positive results for health status and symptom recovery, without an increase in the proportion of exacerbations reported to healthcare providers. The latter is somewhat surprising, but the authors indicate that

a possible explanation can be found in the increased self-efficacy (and possible better self-management strategies) and milder exacerbations in the intervention group. In contrast to other studies (Bourbeau et al 2003, Effing et al 2009, Rice et al 2010) overall health care use did not change. Whereas stand-alone COPD exacerbation action plans are used with increasing frequency, evidence is accumulating Navitoclax that the effectiveness of these plans without

case manager back-up and self-management training is very limited (Walters et al 2010). Self-management training aimed at behavioural change along with case-manager assistance are the strategies most likely crucial to the success of action plans. This study underlines the usefulness NVP-AUY922 of action plans during COPD exacerbations when coupled with case management and implemented as part of straightforward self-management training programs for patients without severe co-morbid diseases. “
“Of the many options for the measurement

of pain in clinical populations, the most commonly used are Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) (Lichter-Kelly 2007). While similar, these two measurement tools employ slightly different methods to quantify pain. Although it is noted that pain is widely considered a multidimensional construct, measurement of pain intensity is often recorded at the exclusion of the other dimensions. While not denying the relevance and importance of the emotional and evaluative aspects of pain, this summary concerns the measurement of pain intensity. Pain intensity: VAS and NRS generally involve a single question that asks the patient to rate Carnitine dehydrogenase their pain intensity on either a 10 cm line (VAS) or by choosing a number, usually between 0 and 10 (NRS). The ends of both scales are anchored by some variant of ‘no pain at all’ and ‘pain as bad as you can imagine’. A VAS is scored by measuring how far along from the ‘no pain’ end point the patient marks the line and the NRS by recording the number chosen. The question specifies a time period, eg, right now, or over the past 24 hours, or over the past week, and also whether the patient should rate average pain, worst pain, or least pain, over that period. Reproducibility and validity of pain intensity: VAS and NRS are generally regarded as acceptable for both research and practice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>