3 years (Standard deviation (SD) 2.1 years), similar to the pre-immunisation survey (19.2 years, SD 2.4 years). There were fewer specimens from community sexual health services in the post-immunisation period (3.1% vs. 24.0% pre-immunisation), which was the venue with the highest HR HPV prevalence in 2008 (with inhibitors relatively more from youth clinics

post-immunisation). The proportion of women with missing information on sexual behaviour increased between the two surveys but there was no change in the reported data with around half of respondents reporting two or more sexual partners in the previous year and a new sexual partner in the previous 3 months. The specimens were broadly representative, in terms of reported sexual behaviour data, of all Crizotinib chlamydia screens reported to PHE for females at the selected venues. Relatively high chlamydia positivity was seen amongst specimens from two laboratories selleck compound (Leeds 26.4%, Lewisham 7.2%, vs. 4.7% at all other laboratories combined) but no reason could be identified for systematic selection bias. The estimated HPV vaccine coverage was 65% for subjects aged 16–18 years, 30% for those 19–21 years and 0% for those 22–24 years. The prevalence of HPV 16 and/or 18 in the post-immunisation survey was lowest in 16–18 year olds, at 6.5% (95% CI: 5.2–8.0%) (Fig. 2). Prevalence increased

with age to 12.5% in 19–21 year olds and 18.6% in 22–24 year olds (p-value for trend <0.0001). In contrast in 2008, the prevalence was highest in 16–18 year olds (19.1%, 95% CI: 16.6–21.8%) and lower at older ages (14.8%, 95% CI: 11.9–18.3% in 22–24 year olds). The 19–21 year olds in the post-immunisation survey (2010–2012) included females eligible and not eligible for immunisation: both these groups had lower HPV prevalence than found pre-immunisation. Females

who were in birth-cohorts eligible for vaccination had a lower prevalence of HPV 16/18 (10.9% [95% CI: 9.2–12.9%]) than those who were not eligible for vaccination (15.3% [95% CI: 11.7–19.7%]), p-value = 0.036. There was no sign of any reduction amongst females aged 22–24 years. There were significant differences in the reduction of prevalence for different ethnic groups; among MYO10 white women the prevalence of HPV 16/18 infection in 16–18 year olds reduced from 19.7% to 6.7% (66%) in pre- vs. post-immunisation surveys whereas for black women this reduction was less marked (and not significant) from 14.9% to 9.4% (37%). There were too few individuals of Asian and other ethnic origin for formal comparison. The adjusted odds ratio for HPV 16/18 infection comparing the post-immunisation period with the pre-immunisation was 0.3 (95%CI: 0.2–0.5) for 16–18 year olds and increased with age (Table 2) as would be expected as a reflection of vaccine coverage and age of immunisation (p-value for heterogeneity <0.0001).