31 Comparison of albumin concentrations measured by the different

31 Comparison of albumin concentrations measured by the different methods has however, shown greater variability.30,31 Size-exclusion High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) has been shown to give consistently higher urinary albumin concentrations H 89 solubility dmso particularly in people with diabetes when compared with the routine immunoassay techniques.32–35 The difference has been attributed to the presence of immunochemically nonreactive albumin which if measured has been postulated to allow for earlier prediction of microalbuminuria in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.34 However, whether

HPLC detects a form of albumin not detected by immunoassay (i.e. non-immunoreactive) or other molecules of approximately the same size as albumin, remains unresolved.36 An analysis of the AusDiab cohort, identified both HPLC-detected albumin and albumin detected by immunonephelometry as risk factors for mortality, however, HPLC detected albumin identifies some people at increased risk of mortality that are not detected by immunonephelometry.37 The clinical significance of HPLC versus immunoassay detected urinary protein has not been established.22 The choice of method to be used by a particular selleck products laboratory depends on factors such as equipment

availability, the number of samples to be processed and the required turnover time for results. There are advantages and disadvantages for each of the methods and these are discussed below: 1 Radioimmunoassay (RIA) In summary, any of the four methods are suitable for routine use. Variation between methods, however, may influence comparison of results between laboratories or by different methods within the one laboratory. A number of groups have demonstrated that storage of frozen urine samples (for 2 weeks to 6 months) at −20°C results in lower measurements of microalbuminuria compared with freshly analysed samples.38,39 However, one group has reported that adequate mixing (3–4 hand inversions) after thawing of frozen aliquots resulted in the same albumin values as unfrozen aliquots measured by nephelometry.40 This same group

found however, that a small number of samples (2–9), despite mixing, gave falsely low urinary albumin results by up to 50%. It is postulated that freezing may medroxyprogesterone distort the target albumin antigen in such a way that antibodies may not detect all of the albumin present. Studies of unfrozen urine samples stored at 4°C for up to 8 weeks have shown no significant effect on urinary albumin.39 It has also been reported that albumin in urine is stable when stored at room temperature for 1 week.41 In view of these findings, it is considered that urinary albumin measurement should either be analysed as fresh specimens or stored unfrozen at 4°C and assayed within 8 weeks. Timed urine collection (either overnight or 24 h) or a single void early morning urine sample should be obtained.

Comments are closed.