(C) 2009 American Institute of Physics [DOI: 10 1063/1 3072717]“

(C) 2009 American Institute of Physics. [DOI: 10.1063/1.3072717]“
“The role of gastrectomy for patients with positive peritoneal cytology, but a negative macroscopic peritoneal implant (P-/cy+), 4SC-202 remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate laparoscopic gastrectomy for P-/cy+ patients.\n\nThis study reviewed a prospectively maintained gastric cancer database of gastric-cancer patients those underwent surgical resection. P-/cy+ gastric cancer that had invaded the subserosa, or deeper layers, of the stomach wall without distant organ metastases was considered operable in this

institution. P-/cy+ patients underwent either open or laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The short-term results were examined to assess differences in outcome between the two groups.\n\nEighteen P-/cy+ patients without distant organ metastases underwent

surgery between 2000 and 2010. Laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed in nine patients and open gastrectomy in nine patients. The estimated blood loss was significantly smaller, the resumption of food intake earlier, and the length AZD2014 inhibitor of postoperative hospital stay shorter in the patients that underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy than in the patients that underwent open gastrectomy. There were no significant differences in the 2-year survival rates between the groups.\n\nLaparoscopic gastrectomy for P-/cy+ patients is a minimally MCC950 datasheet invasive and safe oncologic procedure with good short-term results.”
“Retrobulbar haemorrhage (RBH) is a well described condition which is said to be a common cause of acute proptosis following trauma, but the evidence for this is not strong. The authors reviewed 186 publications on the subject, finding 82

cases of RBH. related to trauma. This analysis suggests that in over half of the cases described, RBH was never proven conclusively. In the authors’ experience RBH is not a common cause of acute proptosis following trauma and other causes need to be considered if patients are to be managed appropriately.”
“Migration and globalization of the nursing workforce affect source countries and destination countries. Policies and regulations governing the movement of nurses from one country to another safeguard the public by ensuring educational comparability and competence. The global movement of nurses and other health care workers calls for quality and safety competencies that meet standards such as those defined by the Institute of Medicine. This article examines nurse migration and employment of internationally educated nurses (IENs) in the context of supporting and maintaining safe, quality patient care environments.

Comments are closed.