The reference lists of the retrieved articles and previous review articles were manually searched for additional relevant references. Ethical approval was not applicable as no human subjects were involved. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines,[29] studies were included in this systematic review C59 wnt manufacturer if they were original research articles (with the conventional research study structure of introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusions), which adopted simulated-patient

methods for non-prescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting and had been published between 1990 and 2010. Systematic reviews, letters to the editor, abstracts, meeting reports and opinion pieces were excluded from the review, as were duplicate articles and those not published in English. The review was not restricted to any country. The following information from relevant studies was then extracted and reviewed by TX: (1) country in which the study was performed; (2) study design; (3) purpose of the study (assessment or educational); (4) whether participants were aware of the impending simulated-patient

visits or not (covert or consented); (5) scenarios and medication requests adopted by the study method (with a particular focus on whether scenarios involved requests for treating selleck inhibitor children); (6) data-collection methods; (7) employment

of performance feedback; (8) methods of feedback delivery; and (9) participant opinions of the simulated patient methodology. A data extraction form to record this information was completed for all studies and subsequently tabulated (Table 4). The data were then reviewed independently by the remaining two authors and discussions were held between all three authors in the event of any discrepancies. The search strategy generated 177 results in IPA, 148 in EMBASE and 34 in MEDLINE. Of these, 31, 30 and 22 respectively were eligible for full text retrieval (Tables 1–3). Further refinement using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, addition of relevant references from retrieved articles and previous reviews, and duplicate exclusion (Figures 1 and 2) resulted in a total of 30 Carbohydrate studies from 31 articles being identified and reviewed according to the criteria described in the method (Table 4). Sixteen of the 30 reviewed studies were cross-sectional (CS) studies, designed to solely assess counselling behaviour of pharmacists and their staff when presented with various scenarios involving non-prescription medicines.[1,4,15,16,22,25,30–40] Two studies were pre–post studies (PP), one assessing performance progress during a national 4-year programme[41] and the other to assess a change in counselling after product rescheduling.