These results indicated that the Gram-negative and Gram-positive

These results indicated that the Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains produce different DON metabolites other than 3-epi-DON. The time-dependent change in cell growth and the DON-degradation capabilities of the strains inoculated in MM media containing 100 μg mL−1 DON (Fig. 4) were examined. Growth of each Gram-positive strain (WSN05-2, LS1, SS1, SS2) on DON was enhanced compared with

that without DON and was accompanied by a decrease of DON level. After at least 6 days of incubation, the concentrations of DON in the media with these strains were below the detection limit. Growth promotion and DON degradation of the other Gram-positive strains after 6 days of incubation were observed (data not shown). In contrast, the Selleckchem Trametinib Gram-negative bacterium RS1 showed neither growth promotion nor declining DON concentrations during the 8 days of incubation. Similar results were obtained for the other Gram-negative strains (data not shown). These results indicated that only the Gram-positive strains are capable of assimilating DON as the carbon source.

The degradation products shown in Fig. 3 were detected during the growth of the Norcardioides strains in MM with DON (Fig. 4), suggesting that the strains assimilate DON through the repeated release and intake of DON and its metabolites. Only two bacterial aerobic DDBs (strains WSN05-2 and E3-39) had been reported previously, with WSN05-2 belonging to the genus Nocardioides and E3-39 being of the Agrobacterium–Rhizobium group (Shima et al., 1997). However, the present 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses revealed that E3-39 is most closely related to Devosia Palbociclib clinical trial sp. 4_C16_46. Thus, all aerobic DDBs reported to date are closely related to the genera Nocardioides and Devosia only. By contrast, all previously reported anaerobic DDBs were Gram-positive and encompassed a variety of genera (Eubacteria, Anaerofilum, Collinsella, Bacillus) and the order Clostridiales (Yu et al., 2010). These results highlight the clear phylogenetic differences between aerobic

Tangeritin and anaerobic DDBs. We also characterized the DON-degradation phenotypes of the aerobic strains in this study, identifying three key differences between the Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. First, there is an obvious difference in the DON-assimilating abilities, as only the Gram-positive strains utilized DON as the carbon source. To our knowledge, DON-assimilating bacteria are limited to the Gram-positive bacteria that we isolated. On the other hand, it is interesting that the Gram-negative strains exhibited no DON-assimilating abilities even though they were isolated using the enrichment culture with DON as the carbon source. This result might imply that the microbial consortia, composed of both Gram-negative DDBs and other microorganisms, performed cooperative catabolism of DON in the enrichment culture media.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>