Thus, for the first time, we show how interactions between LPG an

Thus, for the first time, we show how interactions between LPG and TLR-2 reduce anti-leishmanial responses via cytokine-mediated decrease of TLR-9 expression. Leishmania major, a protozoan parasite that inflicts the disease cutaneous leishmaniasis, resides and replicates in macrophages. Befitting the principle of parasitism, Leishmania infection results in the deactivation of macrophages. This deactivation can result from various processes, such as suppression of oxidative APO866 burst by the Leishmania-expressed

virulence factor lipophosphoglycan (LPG) [1, 2] or by interleukin (IL)-10 [3]. IL-10 can act in an autocrine manner to inhibit macrophage activation [4]. However, whether there is a causal association between LPG and IL-10 production Selleckchem Veliparib is not known. Natural killer (NK) cells express Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2), a receptor for LPG [5]. TLR-2 is also expressed in

macrophages, implying that the observed LPG-induced deactivation of macrophages can, possibly, result from an LPG–TLR-2 interaction. However, TLR-2-deficient mice on a genetically resistant C57BL/6 background and wild-type C57BL/6 mice were comparably resistant to L. braziliensis infection [6], but the mice deficient in myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) – the adaptor molecule responsible for signalling from several TLRs – on the same background were susceptible to L. braziliensis infection, suggesting that more than one TLR is involved in resistance to Leishmania infection. Another TLR that signals through MyD88 and also participates in the host-protective Orotic acid anti-leishmanial immune response is TLR-9. Host-protective anti-leishmanial immune response is elicited by using the TLR-9 ligand cytosine–phosphate–guanosine (CpG) in prophylactic mode [7-9]. As TLR-9-deficient mice on a C57BL/6 background were transiently susceptible [10], the CpG motif containing L. major DNA was suggested

to require TLR-9 for inducing a host-protective effect. TLR-9 has been shown to elicit an anti-leishmanial response through NK cells [11]. Despite discrete reports on LPG-induced macrophage deactivation and the roles for TLR-2 and TLR-9 in anti-leishmanial prophylaxis, to our knowledge neither the relationship between the Leishmania-expressed LPG, TLR-2 and TLR-9 in anti-leishmanial immune response nor the anti-leishmanial efficacy of CpG in a therapeutic mode has ever been tested. In this study, we first characterized the LPG expression levels on a virulent L. major strain and on a less virulent strain derived from the virulent strain. The virulence of the strains was expressed in terms of their ability to infect susceptible BALB/c mice and BALB/c mouse-derived peritoneal macrophages. We examined whether LPG was involved in the modulation of TLR-9 expression and function and whether TLR-2 would contribute to such modulation. We finally examined whether co-administration of CpG and anti-TLR-2 antibody could reduce infection in susceptible BALB/c mice.

Comments are closed.