Two participants from the escitalopram group had undetectable plasma escitalopram,

thus<10nmol/l, one of which had stated missing the last two tablets prior to blood sampling. Plasma escitalopram was undetectable in all participants of the placebo group. The neuropsychological tests The test results at entry are presented in Table 2. The dataset for the neuropsychological tests was complete for 77 participants (96 %) both before (T0) and following 4 weeks of intervention (T4). Both groups improved considerably, presumably due to retest effects (positive values in Z-scores). The change in the general Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical cognitive function score was normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilkes test). Accordingly we tested the difference between the two intervention arms with a t-test, but the difference was insignificant (p=0.37, see Table 3). Table 2. Neuropsychological test results Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical at baseline for 80 first-degree relatives of patients with

major depressive disorder whom participated in the AGENDA trial. Table 3. The distribution of changes (Δ) in results of neuropsychological test measures, perceived stress and mood in first-degree relatives of the AGENDA trial following Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 4 weeks of intervention with escitalopram (n=38) and placebo ( … In univariate analyses no statistically significant correlations were found between change in the general cognitive function score and age, sex, Hamilton depression score at entry, Danish Adult Reading Test, and plasma escitalopram. In post hoc explorative analyses of the factors 1–4 individually, and of the individual tests, no statistically significant

differences were found between Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the escitalopram group and the placebo group. For the CAMCOG test, there was a statistically significant difference between the intervention groups, however, in contrast to the hypothesis, treatment with escitalopram improved the CAMCOG Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical score less than placebo (1.21 [SD 1.92] versus 2.16 [SD 1.98], p=0.04, Table 3). Mood In analyses of mood, no statistically significant differences were found between the escitalopram group and the placebo group, Table 3. Discussion Our hypothesis that an intervention with escitalopram Oxygenase 10mg would have specific beneficial effects on cognitive function in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with MDD was not supported. Thus, there was no statistically significant difference between the change in cognitive function following 4 weeks of intervention with escitalopram 10mg/day compared with matching placebo in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with MDD. Further, no statistically significant differences were seen in change in scale scores of mood between the two intervention groups. The Cyclopamine solubility dmso finding in the CAMCOG test is most likely a type 1 error since many outcomes were explored in this trial.