0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Results The genotype distribution satisfied the hardy-Weinberg selleck inhibitor equilibrium All ovarian cancer patients and healthy controls were local women in Shandong Province, China.

The average age of cases and controls were 52.90 ± 13.26 and 49.89 ± 13.48 years, respectively, and the Student’s t test did not show significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.082). Furthermore, we did not find statistically significant differences between the two groups in other matching characteristics except ovarian cancer family history (P = 0.003) (Table 1). A chi-squared test was used to determine whether the subjects were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Selleck SRT2104 The distributed genotype frequencies of these three SNPs (rs4648551 G>A, rs6695978 G>A, rs873330 T>C) conformed with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both the case and control groups (Table 1), which demonstrated that the population in this study reached genetic equilibrium with typical group representation. Table 1 Distributions of select variables (covariate data) in the cases and controls and test of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the SNPs Variables Cases, n = 308 Controls, n = 324 P Age, year (mean ± SD) 52.90 ± 13.26 49.89 ± 13.48 0.082 Body mass index, kg/m2   0.23 < 23 85 (27.6) 92 (28.4) 23-29 157 (51.0)) 178 (54.9))

≥ 29 66 (21.4) 54 (16.7) Number liveborn, n (%)   0.064 0 19 (6.2) 17 (5.2) 1-2 227 (73.7) 258 (79.6) ≥ 3 62 (20.1) 49 (15.1) Oral SGC-CBP30 clinical trial contraceptive use, n (%)   0.49 never 184 (59.7) 201 (62.0) 1-48 months 55 (17.9) 47 (14.5) ≥ 48 months 69 (22.4) 76 (23.5) Cigarette mafosfamide smoking     0.76

Yes 6 (1.9) 4 (1.2) No 302 (98.1) 320 (98.8) Ovarian caner family history     0.003a Yes 29 (9.4) 7 (2.2) No 279 (90.6) 317 (97.8) Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium     > 0.05b rs 4648551 χ2 = 22.3; P =0.98 χ2 = 0.05; P =0.99   rs 6695978 χ2 = 0.04; P =0.81 χ2 = 10.19; P =0.85   rs 873330 χ2 = 0.16; P =0.72 χ2 = 0.10; P =0.75   a. There are no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the select variables (covariate data) except ovarian cancer family history. b. P >0.05 indicate genotype distributed frequencies in the cases and controls conformed with Hardy-Weinberg genetic equilibrium. The p73 rs6695978 G > A SNP can enhance susceptibility to ovarian cancer. This case–control study included 308 ovarian cancer cases and 324 cancer-free controls. The genotype distributions of the p73 (rs4648551 G > A, rs6695978 G > A) and p63 (rs873330 T > C) polymorphisms between the case and control groups are shown in Table 2. We concluded that the frequency of the A allele in p73 rs6695978 G > A was statistically higher in the case group compared with the control group. Women with the A allele were at increased risk of ovarian cancer compared to carriers of the G allele (OR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.07-2.19; P = 0.003).