044 (−.034 for the original stimuli) for /buk/ and .023 (.034 for the original stimuli) for /puk/. Importantly, the variance in both was much lower in the present experiment (/buk/: SDoriginal = .0046, SDmodified = .0023; /puk/: SDoriginal = .026, SDmodified = .0026). Thus, by both relative measures, the variance in the information
available for voicing was minimized dramatically. Given the relatively slight contribution of this cue to perception in adults, it is clear that we have significantly reduced (if not altogether eliminated) variation in contrastive information in Experiment 3. A final concern was that the coda (/uk/) portion of the two words was not physically identical between /buk/ and /puk/ tokens within a speaker, as it was in Experiments 1 and 2. Coda information could have provided an additional source of constrastive information about voicing. It seems unlikely that such information would be sufficient to distinguish the Wnt antagonist words for two reasons: first, if coda information was necessary to distinguish the word-initial voicing, prior experiments using natural recordings that preserved coda information (Pater, Stager, & Werker, 2004; Rost & McMurray, 2009) would have provided sufficient information selleck for categorization in this task. Second, the effect of voicing on the vowel is small: most of the established cues to word-initial
voicing are found at the release or the aspiration/voicing juncture (Allen & Miller, 1999). Nonetheless, if there was information correlated with voicing, then variability in these cues could have helped the infants. Experiments 1 and 2 rule out contrastive variability alone (particularly as the contrastive cues varied there were much more robust cues to voicing than anything in the coda), but it is possible that these cues, combined with the noncontrastive variability we manipulated, were driving Protein kinase N1 the effect. To
determine if the coda portions of the words contained any information that could contribute to a voicing decision, we measured a number of cues to voicing: the length of the syllable (measured from the release to the onset of closure), the pitch (F0), and the first and second formant frequencies. Measurements of F0, F1, and F2 were conducted twice, once during the first pitch pulse after the onset of voicing and once at the midpoint of the vowel (see Table 1). All of the measurements showed substantial variability. For example, at voicing onset, F0 had an SD of 84 Hz for /buk/ at onset and 97 Hz for /puk/. Similarly, F2 varied by well over 150 Hz at both points. This is perhaps to be expected given the variability in speakers (especially the variability in gender) and register across the Experiment 3 stimulus set and it validates our assumption that these stimuli had substantial variation. However, none of these measures showed significant differences as a function of the word.